Sunday, November 25, 2007

"Happiness is only real if shared."



Christopher McCandless, the doomed Emory University graduate who tossed everything to live the life of a hopeful vagabond criss-crossing America in the early-1990s, scribbled the above quote days before he died of starvation, alone, in a dilapidated bus in rural Alaska where he had been living for months.

The colorful short life of McCandless -- chronicled in Jon Krakauer's book, Into the Wild, and now in the mesmerizing and beautiful Sean Penn film adaptation of the same name -- can be viewed as a spoiled kid posturing through a pretentious rebellion against his troubled, yet privileged, youth. Or, as Penn suggests, his rebellion could also have been a valid attempt to exorcise the past through experiencing life on his own romantic Thoreau-inspired terms.

Into the Wild, the movie, ultimately presents McCandless as somewhat of a tragic figure: two years of a bountiful life full of individualistic adventures and searching, a life where his passion for living touched all he encountered on his journey still ended with his solitary death in a mammoth wilderness so far from the world.

This, however, doesn't make his journey, or the film, seem like a waste. To the contrary, until his lonely passing, the paths McCandless (embodied in a wonderful performance by Emile Hirsch) chose -- whatever his disillusioned intentions -- crammed a lifetime of passion into his short time on Earth. Of course, the very nature of cinema lends itself to romanticizing the celluloid heroes, but with Krakauer's investigations, there was no question that those with whom McCandless shared his nomadic quest were touched by the young man's enthusiastic zeal for the possibilities of this world. The hippie couple (portrayed in the film by the always wonderful Catherine Keener and newcomer Brian Dierker) who saw him as a younger vessel of themselves. The wild farmer (Vince Vaughn) whose wild ways were somewhat tempered by the naivety of McCandless. And, of course, the elderly religious widower (portrayed, in a deeply felt performance, by Hal Holbrook) whose lonely life was turned topsy-turvy by the entry into his world of McCandless, the possible embodiment of a son whose life was lost decades earlier.

It's telling that Penn, of all people, paints a strong spiritual significance to the story of McCandless, where Krakauer tended to discount such ideals. Christ-like imagery of the innocent hero floating naked down a river in a crucifix pose; the hippie dude asking if McCandless could walk on water; and a stirring, emotional scene on a mountain where the widower and McCandless touch on the nature of God -- all of these moments (not to mention the last few minutes depicted of McCandless' life) point to a deeply felt appreciation of a divine touch in our lives and in the life of McCandless.

It's also telling that in Krakauer's book, he notes the widower renounced God when he learned of the young man's lonely passing. That Penn left that point out of the film perhaps shows that, despite one sad man's disillusionment, the life of Christopher McCandless was, indeed, somewhat of a spiritual touchstone that one cannot overlook.

Thus far, 2007 has been a knock-out year for cinema, and I have yet to see The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, There Will Be Blood and I'm Not There. Into the Wild is a significant accomplishment by Sean Penn that will be remembered when one looks back to this productive cinematic year. By all means, add it to your viewing list.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised that so many people have found Into The Wild such a good movie. I say this because there are so many resonances between this movie and other American writers such as Emerson and Thoreau (see "Self-Reliance" or "Walking"). Such writers wholly supported America's policy of Manifest Destiny (which was incidentally a policy of genocide to the First Nations) and continue to provide the ideological weight for the destructiveness known as liberalism (that has now gone worldwide with neo-liberal globalization). Into The Wild continues to perpetuate these age-old myths, and yet everyone thinks that these ideas are new because they've been given a contemporary spin. Out of America, nothing new comes...

Anonymous said...

Because it is not only a movie about the wild, but about a man in the wild.

Look beyond simple political terms.

Guillaume said...

First of all, this movie is not promoting liberalism (as liberalism supposes at least a federal government); this movie is about anarchism, getting rid of money, getting rid of all kinds of enslaving institutions. Furthermore, it's been a long time since liberalism (true liberalism) doesn't exist anymore. The elite, of course, call it "liberlism", but World economy, today, is way closer to communism, for day after day there be fewer and fewer companies serving an ever growing population. Liberalism means liberty, either economic or political; and liberty, today, does not exist. That's what the movie is telling us.

Anonymous said...

It was a great movie. Full of feeling and emotion. That's what this film was about. This lad wasn't rebelling against the "establishment". He was rebelling against the falseness of family. It was a film about familial relationships and how those closest to us often cause us the greatest hurt of all.

Anonymous said...

A movie is a movie, like it or not at the end of the day it is there to make money, which is actually quite ironic in this context,so moving away from the actual simplistic real life account of this guy's life is like trying to force your own views on the world into his story. Whether it has been done before or not, it is what an individual takes out of the story to help them improve there own way of life that is important. For me the quote "happiness is only real if shared" ties the whole story together and tells us that no matter how much you disagree with the failures of the human race, we are all required to live in this world and thus have to face the bad and the good as a whole to improve life for all.

Anonymous said...

don't you think there were people who were passionate about this story and were not just in it for the money?

boletos said...

I'm from Mexico CITY not the whole Mexico (ilegals), DF, Federal District, and this movie is an art piece, God Bless this guy, he found the real sense of the life, pitty for her family he could have made a call just for her sister but anyways, I love his mov, really makes sense. Happiness only real if shared, loved that phrase.

Anonymous said...

You have not read Christ McCandless’s story carefully. He is a true individual who ran free from materialism and social entrapment and found the meaning of individual existence. Nowadays, everyone is pursuing a college degree, a decent internship, a good post graduate school, a good salary, a good car, a good house, a better salary, a better car and a bigger house, and on and on. What is the meaning of life? What differentiates you and others? Do you know how to find the sense of security and peace in mind? Besides loading your house with the materials you do not need, do you know anything else? Can you survive without your laptops, blackberries and Iphones?
These questions were answered by Christ. If you still think his story is all about walking, think again.
Happiness real when shared. You cannot tell people how awesome you feel when you drive your sports car. You cannot tell normal people how tasty the wine is.
But you can tell them you made a positive contribution to someone’s life, you have found the true meaning of life.

Anonymous said...

I have always considered myself a free spirit, trying not to give in to the materialistic nature of society in this crazy world. I feel because of this mentality that Into the Wild touched me so deeply. I find his story tragic and inspiring. Tragic in that so few people in this day and age can truly look at wilderness and nature and appreciate it. All some see is a potential for a new road, shopping mall, or subdivision. In my mind, THAT is God, enjoying the Earth He gave to us and thanking Him for it. This story is inspiring because we all could take a little of what this extremely intelligent man did with his life and incorporate it into our own. We could recycle to save God's beauty here on Earth, treat animals and other humans with respect, and learn to live as though there truly is no tomorrow. I did not know that Sean Penn directed and wrote the screenplay for this film before watching it, but now I have a deeper appreciation for him as a person for bringing this movie to the world.

Anonymous said...

It's about a mistake. A series of catastrophic mistakes that did some good. The question, then, is what good would have come without Chris's rejection of society? If you think back to the end of Gladiator, were the softened hearts worth one good man's life? Was this movie worth one good man's life? Rome wasn't worth it. And neither are you. Neither am I.

TelcoCableDowser said...

This is by far the best movie I have ever seen in my Life. Many profound truths are conveyed throughout the film in a number of soft, subtle modalities. The characters that Chris came into contact with on his sojourn are expertly portrayed as REAL people and remind me quite a bit of people in my own life. Ive watched the film 15+ times and still glean a new nugget of wisdom on occasion. A real must see but have some kleenex ready for the final 2 minutes. The first time I watched it alone I cried so hard my chest cavity spasmed repeatedly.